#8884 closed theme (not-approved)
THEME: Redify - 2.0
| Reported by: | priyanshu.mittal | Owned by: | sabreuse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Keywords: | theme-redify |
| Cc: | priyanshu.mittal@… |
Description
Redify - 2.0
A theme for bloggers that uses multiple nav menus, several sidebars, and custom post layouts. It has a pixel-perfect design that's great for any blogger who wants a new look for their site.
Theme URL - http://redify.webriti.com
Author URL - http://www.webriti.com
SVN - http://themes.svn.wordpress.org/redify/2.0
ZIP - http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/download/redify.2.0.zip?nostats=1
Diff with previous version: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?old_path=/redify/1.9&new_path=/redify/2.0
All previous tickets for this theme: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/query?col=id&col=summary&col=keywords&col=owner&col=status&col=resolution&keywords=~theme-redify&order=id
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 10 months ago by sabreuse
- Owner set to sabreuse
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:2 Changed 10 months ago by sabreuse
- Resolution set to not-approved
- Status changed from assigned to closed
comment:3 Changed 9 months ago by priyanshu.mittal
hi i know after long time pinging i am on a verge of releasing a new verision please tell me what do you mean by this
"In this case, since the function is exposed to non-admin users with no indication that it's part of a theme and not normally part of their actual profile"
and how to solve this i want to develop author box along with the theme.....?
Thanks for submitting the new version of Redify. However, the user avatar function introduced in this version is something that should be handled by a plugin, and should not be used in a theme at all. Please remove it before submitting the next version.
User avatars (whether they are default gravatars or local avatars defined by the many plugins that are available to do the same job) are part of each user's profile data that should persist regardless of which theme is selected; as such, they are plugin territory. In this case, since the function is exposed to non-admin users with no indication that it's part of a theme and not normally part of their actual profile, the user experience issues upon switching themes will be even worse.
From the Theme Review Guidelines (italics added for emphasis):
Presentation vs. Functionality:
Since the purpose of Themes is to define the presentation of user content, Themes must not be used to define the generation of user content, or to define Theme-independent site options or functionality.